Chelton Accuses ALA’s President of Abetting Censorship

By Joan Oleck -- School Library Journal, 11/14/2007 12:00:00 PM

 

Oprah Winfrey’s move last week to withdraw her recommendation of The Education of Little Tree (Delacorte, 1976), an award-winning young adult novel by Forrest Carter, has ignited controversy within library circles, with an outspoken professor of library science accusing the president of the American Library Association (ALA) of abetting censorship.

"When did ALA's president get into the business of aiding and abetting censorship by literary criteria?" asked Mary Chelton, a professor in the Graduate School of Library and Information Studies at Queens College in New York.

Chelton was referring to comments by ALA’s president, Loriene Roy, who responded to Winfrey’s withdrawal of the book from Oprah’s Book Club by telling the Associated Press, "I am surprised, of course, that Winfrey would recommend it. Besides the questions about the author's identity, the book is known for a simplistic plot that used a lot of stereotypical imagery."

Roy was traveling and was not available for comment, according to an ALA spokesperson.

In posts on ALA’s and the Young Adult Library Services Association’s discussion boards, Chelton wrote, "Oprah can do what she damn well pleases and probably will, with or without ALA's blessing, but I expect better of the ALA president. This is ridiculous, and deeply offensive to those of us who have spent entire careers defending the public's right to read what they please!"

Little Tree, once marketed as an autobiography, is about an orphan Cherokee boy’s experience of racism in the 1930s. It was later learned that the book’s author, Asa Carter, was a white supremacist who penned Alabama Governor George Wallace’s infamous "Segregation forever" speech. Carter died in 1979.

Winfrey, who acknowledged knowing these facts back in 1994, said that she felt inclined "to take the book off my shelf," but apparently did not follow through.

Chelton is opposed to censoring what some see as good reading material, simply because it’s politically incorrect. "I’m sorry, but bigots have First Amendment rights too," she says.

"If you start down that road on the assumption that all we stand for is the good, the true, and the beautiful, Danielle Steele’s going to be out of every published library."  

 

© 2007, Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted January 7, 2002.

Harry Potter Books Burn
as Library Showcases Rowling Titles

A display of Harry Potter books at the Alamogordo (N. Mex.) Public Library was a marked contrast to a December 30 book burning of works written by J. K. Rowling and others that took place outside the city’s Christ Community Church. Held on church property after a half-hour prayer service, the event drew several hundred congregants and as many as 800 counterprotesters.

After Pastor Jack Brock sermonized about fire as a cleansing instrument, some worshippers placed into the bonfire personal copies of the Potter series as well as such items as J. R. R. Tolkien novels, issues of Cosmopolitan and Young Miss magazines, AC/DC recordings, The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, and ouija boards. Brock, who organized the demonstration, characterized the Potter series as “a masterpiece of satanic deception.”

People also reacted with “generous cash donations” to the city library, Director Jim Preston told American Libraries. “With this money we are purchasing additional copies of Harry Potter, Tolkien, and Shakespeare.”

The library has extended the Harry Potter display, which was originally mounted in conjunction with the Sorcerer’s Stone November 2001 movie premiere, to reassure children who’ve worried aloud that “Harry Potter may not be safe at the library,” Preston added.

Posted January 7, 2002.

 

Available at <http://www.ala.org/ala/alonline/currentnews/newsarchive/2002/january2002/ALA_print_layout_1_22362_22362.cfm>